Build advices

Community General Discussion
61

Elaborate this, Capped at this.

62

is 8 the cap?

63

it is for now.
4 blood magic + 2(+2setnumber)
but diieter said thousands time that it is presumably gonna becapped at 6 on the next patch.

64

[quote=“ichsanization”]it is for now.
4 blood magic + 2(+2setnumber)
but diieter said thousands time that it is presumably gonna becapped at 6 on the next patch.[/quote]
This is exactly what i mean… You can only equip 2( +2 set numbers)… I dont exactly test this one so im asking… But the set itself can go beyond 4…

65

Elaborate this, Capped at this.

[/quote]
Noted…

66

[quote=“ninjaning”][quote=“kheL”]@ninjaning

Hey… I suggest you to changes your name so we could find you on the leaderboards easily… :smile:[/quote]
please suggest me some names[/quote]

Gandalf, Dumbledork, or Voldemort… whatever!

It’s up to you… :laughing:

xmarks is a lot better!

67

[quote=“ninjaning”]Mirror x 3 → DMG x 3 ??? :smile:
[/quote]

Mirrors aren’t dealing 100% of your damage

[quote=“xmarks”][quote=“Diieter”]Not bad but I would suggest you to delete a “Setnumber+2” for anything else, because it’s gonna be capped at 1.7
Better get some critdmg75% imo :smile:[/quote]
Please elaborate further… “Set numbers” is already capped at 4…[/quote]

Already? it’s supposed to be capped at 1.7 not at 1.6 yet, I presume it got capped at 1.6.3 (your current version) otherwise it’s weird that people like ninja can reach (7) with with 3 setnumbers and 1 single set affix

Yep

[quote=“ichsanization”]it is for now.
4 blood magic + 2(+2setnumber)[/quote]

True

I didn’t say this thousands time and not even a single time!

68

Sigh … I explained it tons of time, and also gave a full and complete and clear example of this, but gonna do it once more :

  • setnumber+1 => +1 at set affixes (whatever they are)

  • setnumber+2 => +2 at set affixes (whatever they are)

  • setnumber+X are capped to 2, it does mean that you can only have +4 at set affixes (whatever they are) through “setnumber+X”

  • “set affix” => 1 at this single “set affix”

  • “set affix” is limited to 1 per item

  • “set affix” is limited to a total of 7 on your whole stuff (6 items + 1 pet)

Exemple : Ascendant

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” => Ascendant (1)

  • 7 set affix “ascendant” => Ascendant (7)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (2)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (3)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (3)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (5)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (3)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (4)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (4)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (6)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (4)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (5)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (5)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (7)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (5)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (6)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (6)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (6)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (7)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (7)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (7)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

Enough clear? :unamused:

1 Like
69

According to the blog on DQ site… All set ranks are capped at 4, which means you can add set numbers affix up to 4…

70

Wow I’m impressed by your lack of understanding! :open_mouth:

Source : shinyboxgames.com/blog/2014/09/p … tch-notes/

“All Set Ranks – 4” (All set ranks = Setnumbers+X)

So the max value of total setnumbers is 4, right?

But you can’t get setnumbers+4 as the affix itself has only 2 values : setnumber+1 and setnumber+2
So, with my mathematics skills, from hard and complicates calculations, I find something like : “to get setnumber4, I have to get 2 affixes of setnumbers+2”

(I hope it’s clear enough now, especially with the complete and detailed exemple from my previous post)

1 Like
71

Diieter, to comment on changes

854×480

72

[quote=“ninjaning”]Diieter, to comment on changes

854×480
[/quote]

Depends on many parameters, iceburn is kinda nice if you’re using a manashield :unamused:

73

[quote=“Diieter”][quote=“ninjaning”]Diieter, to comment on changes

854×480
[/quote]

Depends on many parameters, iceburn is kinda nice if you’re using a manashield :unamused:[/quote]
I do not use mana sheld :smile:,i use teleport

74

So iceburn is completly useless for you :

dungeonquest.wikia.com/wiki/dictionnary

75

[quote=“Diieter”]So iceburn is completly useless for you :

dungeonquest.wikia.com/wiki/dictionnary[/quote]
Yes, so I replaced by the spell sword of rogue. and this is my video at floor 305 (new)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DRKjXm991Xo

76

[quote=“Diieter”]Sigh … I explained it tons of time, and also gave a full and complete and clear example of this, but gonna do it once more :

  • setnumber+1 => +1 at set affixes (whatever they are)

  • setnumber+2 => +2 at set affixes (whatever they are)

  • setnumber+X are capped to 2, it does mean that you can only have +4 at set affixes (whatever they are) through “setnumber+X”

  • “set affix” => 1 at this single “set affix”

  • “set affix” is limited to 1 per item

  • “set affix” is limited to a total of 7 on your whole stuff (6 items + 1 pet)

Exemple : Ascendant

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” => Ascendant (1)

  • 7 set affix “ascendant” => Ascendant (7)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (2)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (3)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (3)

  • 1 set affix “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (5)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (3)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (4)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (4)

  • 2 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (6)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (4)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (5)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (5)

  • 3 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (7)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (5)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (6)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (6)

  • 4 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (6)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (7)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (7)

  • 5 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (7)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 6 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+1 => Ascendant (8)

  • 7 set affixes “ascendant” + 2 setnumber+2 => Ascendant (8)

Enough clear? :unamused:[/quote]

Wow
SoGenius
MuchFabulous
SoMathematicalThink
Wow!

77

combination of warriors on the wizard. :smile:)

854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480
854×480

78

[quote=“ninjaning”]
Yes, so I replaced by the spell sword of rogue. and this is my video at floor 305 (new)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DRKjXm991Xo[/quote]

Is it me or there’s something wrong about that gold amount? [emoji29]

79

[quote=“kheL”]@ninjaning

Hey… I suggest you to changes your name so we could find you on the leaderboards easily… :smile:[/quote]
heoconvietnam

80

[quote=“ninjaning”][quote=“kheL”]@ninjaning

Hey… I suggest you to changes your name so we could find you on the leaderboards easily… :smile:[/quote]
heoconvietnam[/quote]

Good! :smile: